This document provides guidance for members of the public on how to submit effective comments in response to federal regulatory proposals. It emphasizes that while expressing support or opposition is important, comments that are well-reasoned, concise, and supported by scientific evidence or personal impact are more influential in shaping regulatory policy. The document recommends thoroughly understanding the regulatory material, seeking clarification from agency contacts if needed, and referencing specific sections or previous comments when responding. Contributors are encouraged to focus on issues most relevant or understandable to them, respond to agency questions, and suggest alternatives where appropriate, always providing clear justification and supporting data—including quantitative, qualitative, or experiential evidence—to strengthen their positions.
The guidance also notes that the regulatory comment process is not a public vote; agencies make decisions based on substantive reasoning and evidence rather than the quantity of form letters received. Therefore, a single, substantive submission can be more impactful than numerous identical messages. Commenters are advised to identify any relevant expertise, articulate both pros and cons, address alternative perspectives, and use organized attachment naming conventions for clarity. Practical tips include starting early, keeping a copy of submissions, and understanding that the process seeks to inform policy through robust, well-supported input rather than simply tallying public opinion. The document concludes with a disclaimer that it is meant to guide commenters and is not legal advice.
