Comment Letter
COGR Comment Letter on Research Terms and Conditions 12-9-15
The Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), representing major research universities, submits a formal response to the National Science Foundation regarding the revised Research Terms and Conditions (RTCs) linked to the Uniform Guidance for federal awards. COGR expresses appreciation for several measures within the new RTCs that streamline administration and reduce burden, particularly changes a
DoEd_12-14-15_aau_aplu_autm_cogr
The letter, jointly authored by leaders of the Association of American Universities (AAU), the Association of Public Land-grant Universities (APLU), the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), and the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), provides detailed comments on the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed rule mandating open licensing for all copyrightable intellectual prop
COGR_Procurement_Jan20_2016
The Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), representing major research universities and allied organizations, submitted this letter to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to address concerns about the implementation of federal procurement standards under the OMB Uniform Administrative Requirements (2 CFR 200). While COGR expressed appreciation for OMB’s collaborative approach during the d
RCA Letter_FOA F15AS00464jb1
The document is a formal letter from the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), an association representing 190 research universities and related organizations, addressed to Karen Murphy at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The letter expresses concern over the conflict of interest (COI) requirements specified in Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) F15AS00464. COGR highlights several issue
March-in_Rights_Under_Bayh-Dole
The document is a formal letter from the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), representing leading U.S. research universities and associated institutions, addressed to Dr. Mark Rohrbaugh, Director of the Office of Technology Transfer at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The letter discusses the significance of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, emphasizing the Act's
Proposed_OMB_Guidelines_COGR_Comment
The document provides an overview and analysis of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) final guidelines for peer review of influential scientific information, issued in December 2004 under the Information Quality Act. These guidelines are designed to improve the quality and reliability of scientific information used in federal agency decision-making. While universities are not directly affe
Proposed_Bulletin_on_Peer_Review_and_Information_Quality
The Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), representing over 150 leading research universities, provided detailed commentary on the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) proposed Bulletin on Peer Review and Information Quality. While COGR supports the foundational goals of objectivity, utility, quality, and integrity in federal agency information dissemination, the organization raises signifi
FINAL_COGR_AAU_Comments_Reporting Requirements_USDA_August 2015
The Association of American Universities (AAU) and the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), representing major research universities and affiliated institutes, submitted joint comments to the USDA regarding a petition from the National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS). This petition requested amendments to the Animal Welfare Act reporting regulations, specifically to require research facilitie
NIH Dr Lund 6-22-16final
The document is a formal correspondence from the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR) addressed to Drs. Kay Lund and Henry Khachaturian of the National Institutes of Health. Written on behalf of COGR and the Research Compliance Committee, the letter aims to summarize and reiterate key discussion points from a previously held meeting concerning guidance and policies for federally funded postdoc
