The "Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements in Academic Research," developed by the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), serves as a guidance tool for academic institutions to systematically assess and manage the risks associated with international research collaborations. Recognizing the essential role of global engagement in scientific advancement and addressing societal challenges, the framework responds to heightened concerns raised by U.S. federal agencies and policymakers about potential “foreign influence” in the research enterprise. Rather than prescribing rigid procedures, the document provides a flexible structure comprising prompts and considerations across areas such as institutional governance, policy basis for review, facts for engagement analysis, compliance with disclosure requirements, identification of key risks, and development of risk management strategies. Notably, it addresses a spectrum of potential risks—ranging from conflicts of interest and commitment, legal and financial exposures, to intellectual property security and regulatory compliance—including situations involving high-risk countries and sensitive technologies.
The framework emphasizes thorough documentation, interdepartmental collaboration, and proactive disclosure, urging institutions to adapt its components to their individual contexts and risk tolerances. It underlines the importance of managing relationships in a way that both upholds research integrity and avoids unduly impeding scientific openness or global competitiveness. Through detailed prompts and illustrative case studies, the document demonstrates common scenarios and critical questions for evaluating global research activities, such as international lectures, visiting scholars, research collaborations, and consultancy roles. Ultimately, the framework aims to aid institutions in balancing the benefits of global research involvement with prudent risk mitigation, ensuring compliance with both internal policies and external regulations. It is presented as a living document, subject to revision as best practices and regulatory guidance evolve.
