Event Materials
Miscellaenous
The revised Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, issued by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), provides updated and detailed guidance to federal agencies regarding the peer review of influential scientific information disseminated to the public. Unlike the prior guidelines, which merely encouraged peer review, this Bull
February 2016 Registration Materials
The Council on Governmental Relations (COGR) announced the details for its upcoming regular meeting to be held at the Washington Marriott Georgetown Hotel in Washington, D.C., on February 25-26, 2016. The agenda encompasses a range of activities including interest group sessions on current issues, forums, committee reports, and updates from other associations, as well as opportunities for networki
October_2012_COGR_Meeting_Agenda
The document outlines the agenda for the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR) meeting scheduled for October 25-26, 2012, at the Washington Marriott Hotel. The agenda details logistical information for attendees—including hotel reservation procedures and registration policies—and emphasizes that participation is limited to representatives from member institutions and affiliates. The meeting com
October_2012_Thursday_Morning_Presentation_-_Feldman
This document is an October 2012 presentation by Jean Feldman, Head of the Policy Office in the Division of Institution & Award Support at the National Science Foundation (NSF), outlining significant updates to NSF policies and procedures for the research and grantee community. Key topics include an update on the process and status of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) waiver reques
October_2012_Thursday_Afternoon_Presentation_-_Schrankler
The presentation by Jay Schrankler, delivered at the October 2012 COGR Meeting, centers on the evolving role of university technology transfer and the University of Minnesota’s strategic efforts to foster productive relationships with industry partners. It critically assesses whether universities have met expectations in terms of technology commercialization, noting that traditional goals—such as
