This document provides comprehensive guidance for technology transfer professionals on navigating the complex and evolving landscape of U.S. research security...
Other Science & Security
Understanding the complete research security landscape is essential to ensuring compliance while maintaining an open and collaborative research environment.
Featured
Summary of NSTC Guidance for Implementing National Security Presidential Memorandum 33 Disclosure Requirements
The NSTC Guidance for Implementing National Security Presidential Memorandum 33 (NSPM-33) Disclosure Requirements, Version 2.0 (January 11, 2022), outlines uniform...
Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements in Academic Research (V.1)
The "Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements in Academic Research," developed by the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), serves as a guidance...
Resources
Point of Contact
All Other Science & Security Articles
Principles for Evaluating Conflict of Commitment Concerns in Academic Research (Update)
Updated September 22, 2021This paper examines the issue of conflict of commitment in the context of concerns regarding inappropriate foreign influence, promoting transparency, and avoiding conflicts.
Federal Focus on Inappropriate Foreign Influence on Research: Practical Considerations in Developing an Institutional Response
This paper provides an overview of points that institutions should consider on issues related to research security as they perform risk assessments and develop/implement processes to appropriately address areas of higher research security risk
Restrictions on Research Awards: Troublesome Clauses. A Report of the AAU/COGR Task Force
The AAU/COGR Task Force report examines the growing prevalence and impact of restrictive clauses—termed “troublesome clauses”—in U.S. research awards, particularly those that limit the dissemination of research findings or the participation of foreign nationals without prior approval. Despite the long-standing federal policy articulated in National Security Decision Directive 189 (NSDD 189)—which
Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements In Academic Research: March 2020 Meeting
The document outlines the development and objectives of a framework by the Research Ethics & Compliance Committee (REC) for the review of individual global engagements in academic research. The framework is designed to help institutions manage the benefits and risks of global research collaborations through structured disclosure, risk assessment, and risk management strategies, with the aim of
COGR’s Response to JCORE RFI
COGR submitted comprehensive comments to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) regarding the American Research Environment. COGR commended OSTP for its cross-agency efforts to address persistent challenges in research administration, emphasizing that the proliferation of federal regulations and inconsistent agency requirements has increased administrative burdens, potentia
Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements in Academic Research (V.1)
The "Framework for Review of Individual Global Engagements in Academic Research," developed by the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), serves as a guidance tool for academic institutions to systematically assess and manage the risks associated with international research collaborations. Recognizing the essential role of global engagement in scientific advancement and addressing soc
The China Initiative: October 2019 Meeting
The document discusses the U.S. Department of Justice’s response to economic and national security threats posed by the Chinese government, with a focus on the “China Initiative.” It addresses two principal concerns within academia: theft of intellectual property, trade secrets, and advanced technologies, and efforts to influence and compromise academic openness. A significant portion of U.S. econ