Regulatory Reform
COGR's Response to JCORE RFI
COGR Submits Joint Letter to EPA Expressing Concern on Proposed Rule "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science"
Conflict of Commitment Policies for COGR Member Institutions
Foreign Influence Resources Provided by COGR Members
Joint Letter to HHS on Fetal Tissue Research
COGR Research Regulatory Reform Matrix
Engage Research Institutions on Research Regulatory Reform
Science, July 20, 2018
COGR Releases Matrix of Recent Legislative Actions Taken to Reduce Research Regulatory Burden
Joint Association Comments on USDA Regulatory Reform
COGR Recommendations on Research Regulatory Reform
Posted August 24, 2017
Recommendations for HHS and NIH Research Regulatory Reform (Updated 2/28/18)
Recommendations for Non-HHS Research Regulatory Reform
Discussion Points on Facilities and Administrative Costs and Regulatory Reform
COGR Submits Joint Association Letter on DOE Regulatory Reform
Joint Association Request to OMB on the Research Policy Board
COGR Supports Cures Legislation in Letter to Senate HELP Staff
GAO Report on Federal Research Grants
COGR Preliminary Analysis of GAO Report on Federal Research Grants
National Academies Report Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research
The National Academies Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements released Part 2 of its report, Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research; A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century on June 29. The full report is now available online. Appendix B of the report includes a table of recommendations.
COGR's Response to Part 1 of the National Academies Report
COGR's Response to Part 2 of the National Academies Report
National Academies Panel on Reforming Regulation and Reporting Requirements - Lisa Nichol's Remarks on Behalf of the Council on Governmental Relations
Actions for Reducing Administrative Work for Federally Sponsored Research
Reports from the National Academies, National Science Board, Federal Demonstration Partnership and others have highlighted increasing regulatory burden for federally funded research. Many of the recommendations for reducing burden target federal regulations and policies. Part 1 of the National Academies report, Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research, also recommended that research institutions review policies developed to comply with federal regulations to determine whether the institution has created additional and unnecessary administrative burden.
The checklist COGR has created highlights actions that more closely adhere to regulation and policy or otherwise offer the potential to reduce administrative work in a number of areas including those researchers have identified as being particularly burdensome. Many of the approximately 100 actions put forward have previously been initiated at some of our member institutions with positive effect. However, we note that they may not be relevant, or applicable, to all institutions and that institutions may have reasons for establishing criteria that exceed the minimum regulatory requirements (e.g., state law). The list is intended to represent action taken, and ideas to consider, rather than a recommended action plan. We will continue to modify and expand the checklist in response to member feedback.
Resources
NIH Initiative to Reduce Regulatory Burden (1999)
Federal Demonstration Partnership Faculty Workload Survey Reports (2012)
National Academies report Research Universities and the Future of America (2012)
National Science Board report Reducing Investigators’ Administrative Workload for Federally Funded Research (2014)
National Academies report Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research (2016)
Government Accountability Office report Federal Research Grants: Opportunities Remain for Agencies to Streamline Administrative Requirements (2016)
21st Century Cures Act, section 2034, Reducing Administrative Burden for Researchers (2016)
Reforming Animal Research Regulations: Workshop Recommendations to Reduce Regulatory Burden (2017)